一個週末寫TensorFlow或可以救火幾百次的。那是神人,我們凡人作不到,也不適合我們參考。 我記得 "Mythical man month"有提到,一個專業程式師一天平均寫10行程式。 那如何有效率利用這短短的幾行程式才是重點。 那如何成為有效率的0.1x工程師? https://benjiweber.co.uk/blog/2016/01/25/why-i-strive-to-be-a-0-1x-engineer/ https://tinyurl.com/y62xeak3 這篇很好可以看看 最重點 Let’s not build that feature. ( Is there existing software that could be used instead?) Let’s not add this functionality. ( Does the complexity it will introduce really justify its existence?) Let’s not build that product yet. ( Can we first do some small things to test the assumption that it will be valuable?) Let’s not build/deploy that development tool. ( Can we adjust our process or practices instead to make it unnecessary?) Let’s not adopt this new technology. ( Can we achieve the same thing with a technology that the team is already using and familiar with? “The best tool for the job” is a very dangerous phrase.) Let’s not keep maintaining this feature. ( What is blocking us from deleting this code?) Let’s not automate this. ( Can we find a way to not need to do it all?) 一個凡人能寫的文件,程式都有限,如何取捨是我們需要好好考慮與學習的。 ------------------ PS:我不喜歡Elon Musk,他現在處理twitter的方式也太粗暴,但他有些想法是值得我們學習的。 砍掉Microservice,砍掉無用的功能如(也許他是亂砍一通) https://i.imgur.com/APxfO9E.png
就看他如何精簡功能,看看那些考慮是值得我們學習的。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(pttsite.org.tw), 來自: 101.137.165.66 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://pttsite.org.tw/Soft_Job/M.1668469641.A.9A2
GALINE: 目標正確,但是 refactor 的很粗暴,常見的老人新人衝突.. 11/15 11:42
KAOKAOKAO: 推。Gene Kim: 任何在非瓶頸上的最佳化成效都是幻覺。 11/15 11:47
brendonfish: 推這篇 11/17 23:52
vvind: 推 11/19 15:13
purplvampire: 推 11/21 17:41
yes500: 這個包養網正妹好多 是真的嗎 11/21 17:41